- The aim of this lesson is to understand the reasons for success and pitfalls involved in team sport participation (Equivalent to UK A Level Physical Education)
Team: "Two or more persons interacting with one another and influencing each other" (Shaw, 1976)
Group: "Has a collective identity, sharing a common purpose with structured communication patterns" (Carron, 1980)
Group Performances
The following equation was produced by Steiner (1972) to demonstrate the relationship between performance of the team and the individuals:
Actual productivity = best potential productivity - losses due to faulty processes
These faulty processes can be divided into two groups:
Co-ordination problems:
Tactics and plays involving more than one individual (most in team sports!) are subject to problems due to a lack or co-ordination. Examples include making a run too early or a poorly times pass.
Motivational problems:
Team performances often result in individuals performing below their best, there are two theories as to why this is often the case:
The Ringlemann effect:
Research has demonstrated that a team does not usually work as many times better than the number of individuals within the team. For example, a tug of war team containing 6 members, may not perform 6 times better than an individual. This is due to:
Social loafing:
Team players loose the motivation to work as hard because their efforts are not clear and a good performance is not wholly dependant on their performance.
Cohesion and Performance
Cohesion: The reason that a group of people have come together and the resistance to the group breaking up
Two types of cohesion may be present in different teams:
Task oriented cohesion: The team exists and survives in order to be successful at the chosen sport. Everyone in the team has the same goal
Social oriented cohesion: The team exists and survives due to the social relationships and interactions within the team. Results do not really matter, enjoyment is key to the teams survival
Task-oriented teams have a higher potential for success than social oriented teams. This is especially clear in sports such as football and basketball, as opposed to badminton and athletics. |
